The Two Plans
About the book
Distinguished by originality, lucidity and analytical faculty, this book presents a critical study of the Two (First & Second Five Year) Plans. Its penetrating analysis and sound approach shed a great deal of light on conception, inception, execution, promises and performance of the Plans. Not only that, it gives a timely warning to the airy idealists, selfcomplacent people in power and outside, theoretical statisticians and totalitarian thinkers that it would be desirable to reconsider our whole attitude towards planning, and if we cannot take to correct policies, the future of the whole nation may be jeopardised. Planning is a dynamic process and is based on the traditional values and fundamental postulates of a country�s life and culture. The persons responsible for planning in India seem to have been either ignorant or deliberately preferred to ignore this important consideration. The book by eminent nationalist thinker Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay raises critical questions and vital issues concerning our socioeconomic ills and evils and their patent and popular remedies imported and imbibed either from the Communist or the Capitalist countries.
Read more₹
350
280 20% off
Unavailable
Format
About the Book
Distinguished by originality, lucidity and analytical faculty, this book presents a critical study of the Two (First & Second Five Year) Plans. Its penetrating analysis and sound approach shed a great deal of light on conception, inception, execution, promises and performance of the Plans. Not only that, it gives a timely warning to the airy idealists, selfcomplacent people in power and outside, theoretical statisticians and totalitarian thinkers that it would be desirable to reconsider our whole attitude towards planning, and if we cannot take to correct policies, the future of the whole nation may be jeopardised.
Planning is a dynamic process and is based on the traditional values and fundamental postulates of a country�s life and culture. The persons responsible for planning in India seem to have been either ignorant or deliberately preferred to ignore this important consideration.
The book by eminent nationalist thinker Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay raises critical questions and vital issues concerning our socioeconomic ills and evils and their patent and popular remedies imported and imbibed either from the Communist or the Capitalist countries.
Book details
- Format
- Hardbound
- Publisher
- Prabhat Prakashan
- Weight
- 670 grams
- ISBN-13
- 9789351860730
- Pages
- 280
- Reading time
- ~9 hrs
- Age
- 18+
- Country of origin
- India
- Dimensions
- 14 × 21.5 cm
- Language
- English
Customer reviews
Be the first to write a review
Read this one? Tell other readers what you thought about the story, the translation and the print.
The Two Plans is a rare critical interrogation of India's foundational development strategy — the First and Second Five-Year Plans launched in 1951 and 1956. At a time when the nation's economic architecture was treated with near-religious reverence, this book applied analytical rigor to examine the distance between stated ambitions and ground realities. It questions the assumptions of airy idealists, the complacency of policymakers, and the totalitarian temptations lurking within centralized planning. What distinguishes this work is not ideological posturing but forensic clarity — it dissects conception, execution, and outcomes with a precision that forces readers to confront uncomfortable truths about India's early economic experiments. For anyone seeking to understand why post-Independence India took the economic path it did — and what was sacrificed along the way — this book offers indispensable historical insight grounded in evidence, not mythology.
What kind of reading experience does The Two Plans offer?
The Two Plans demand intellectual engagement, not passive consumption. It reads like a judicial review — measured, evidence-based, unsparing in its scrutiny of India's early economic planning. The tone is analytical rather than polemical, yet the conclusions are disquieting. Readers accustomed to triumphalist accounts of nation-building will find this sobering. It rewards those who want to understand how decisions were made, why outcomes diverged from promises, and what was occluded by official optimism. The experience is one of clarity cutting through ideology.
Who should read this book, and what background does it expect?
- Students of Indian economic history are seeking primary sources for critical analysis from the planning era.
- Policymakers and economists are questioning the legacy of centralized development models.
- Readers interested in the gap between post-Independence ideals and institutional realities.
- Anyone curious about why India's early industrial strategy succeeded in some sectors and failed in others?
- It assumes familiarity with basic economic concepts but does not require technical training — lucidity is a hallmark of its approach.
Why does a critique of India's 1950s Five-Year Plans matter to readers today?
Contemporary debates over economic liberalization, state intervention, and development priorities are rooted in the planning framework established in the 1950s. This book exposes the foundational tensions — between democratic accountability and technocratic control, between aspiration and capacity — that still shape Indian policy. Understanding what went wrong in those early decades clarifies why reforms were inevitable in 1991 and why arguments over the role of the state remain unresolved. It connects history to the present structure of India's economy.
What makes this author's critique of the Five-Year Plans distinctive?
While many contemporaries either celebrated the Plans as visionary or dismissed them on ideological grounds, this book applies forensic analysis to the gap between promises and performance. It does not reject planning as a concept but interrogates its execution with data, logic, and an eye for institutional dysfunction. The originality lies in its willingness to challenge not just outcomes but the assumptions of self-complacent elites and theoretical statisticians who mistook models for reality. It is a critique from within the discourse, not from an external ideological vantage point.
What does this book leave the reader with after finishing it?
- A sharper understanding of why India's economic trajectory diverged from its founders' intentions.
- Skepticism toward uncritical faith in centralized planning and expert consensus.
- Appreciation for the complexity of translating ideals into institutions in a newly independent democracy.
- Tools to question contemporary policy narratives with the same analytical rigor applied here to the 1950s.
- A sense that honest assessment, however uncomfortable, is more valuable than comforting mythology.
