Unjudging Women
₹
284
₹ 241.4 (15% off)
Available
This book is based on a critical feminist reading of selected Delhi High Court judgements pronounced in the 1990s. It focuses on the phenomenon of female criminality and the pervasiveness of the disciplinary powers of law in our lives. Through an overview of existing studies on female crime in India and the interaction with the working) of the law and the legal system, This engagement pushes our understanding of law from an instrument of control and mode of social transformation to mere rhetoric. Not to argue for the futility of engaging with the law but emphasising the need to look at it closely and critically.
Read moreAbout the Book
This book is based on a critical feminist reading of selected Delhi High Court judgements pronounced in the 1990s. It focuses on the phenomenon of female criminality and the pervasiveness of the disciplinary powers of law in our lives. Through an overview of existing studies on female crime in India and the interaction with the working) of the law and the legal system, This engagement pushes our understanding of law from an instrument of control and mode of social transformation to mere rhetoric. Not to argue for the futility of engaging with the law but emphasising the need to look at it closely and critically.
Book Details
Customer Reviews
14/12/2022
Spriha Upadhyay
This is to all the women out there. And to all the men who value the women in their lives. Yes, we are in the modern times, yet there are enormous times when women are judged on the basis of their choices: the clothes they wear, the habits the develop, the lifestyle, even the words they speak. This book specifically attracted me while I was looking over Rachnaye app @rachnayeofficial because of the very attractive title. And the book has not been any disappointment. Its an absolute masterpiece. To all the prospected readers, this offers a critical feminist perspective to all the Delhi High Court Judgements. It carries views of various accomolished people on the subject and guards you with the necessary armour and accessories to stop the diatribe of any imbecile lecturing you over your choices. The best part of the book is, it always develops a very critical thinking of the reader in the field of law by giving them a glimpse in all.the court cases and hence empowers you Absolutely all my love to the author who has done an outstanding job of compiling such a complex narrative and presenting to us in simple words. Happy reading!
Unjudging Women dismantles the progressive myth of law by exposing how 1990s Delhi High Court judgements encoded disciplinary control over women accused of crimes. Rather than advancing a case-by-case study, this book performs a critical feminist reading of judicial language itself — revealing how courtroom rhetoric about female criminality reinforced patriarchal norms under the guise of legal neutrality. The author situates Indian judgements within existing studies on female crime in India, tracing how legal discourse positioned deviant women as objects to be corrected rather than subjects deserving justice. What emerges is a portrait of law not as an instrument of social transformation but as a site where gender norms are reproduced through the state's disciplinary apparatus. For readers trained in feminist jurisprudence or gender studies, this work offers a precise methodological demonstration of how to read judicial texts against their own claims to impartiality.
What kind of reading experience does Unjudging Women offer?
This book demands active, critical engagement rather than passive absorption. It reads like a legal autopsy — methodical, unsettling, and intellectually rigorous. The prose dissects judicial reasoning with forensic precision, exposing contradictions between stated legal principles and actual gender biases. Readers encounter courtroom language not as authoritative pronouncements but as texts ripe for deconstruction. The experience is intellectually bracing, rewarding those comfortable with feminist theory and critical legal studies. It leaves behind a lasting scepticism toward claims that law alone can liberate women.
Who should read this book and what background does it require?
- Law students and legal scholars interested in feminist jurisprudence and critical legal theory
- Gender studies researchers examining how state institutions discipline women's behaviour
- Activists working on criminal justice reform who need theoretical grounding in how courts reproduce patriarchal norms
- Readers comfortable with 1990s Indian legal context and familiar with academic feminist analysis
- Those prepared to engage with dense legal excerpts and sustained theoretical argument rather than narrative storytelling
Why does a feminist critique of 1990s court judgements matter to contemporary Indian readers?
The disciplinary logic this book exposes in 1990s Delhi High Court judgements persists in Indian courts today. Contemporary debates over women's autonomy — from choice of clothing to sexual consent to economic independence — still unfold within legal frameworks that position female deviation as a social problem requiring correction. Understanding how judicial rhetoric historically pathologised women accused of crimes reveals the continuity of gender surveillance mechanisms. This historical lens equips readers to recognise when modern courts invoke progressive language while reinforcing regressive gender norms through sentencing patterns and character assessments.
What distinguishes this author's approach to studying female criminality and law?
Rather than treating judgements as transparent records of justice administered, the author reads them as disciplinary texts that reveal law's regulatory ambitions over women's lives. This methodological shift — from law as instrument to law as rhetoric — exposes how courtroom language about female criminals served to police acceptable femininity itself. The focus on the 1990s, a decade of economic liberalisation and women's movement consolidation, captures a moment when courts faced unprecedented female agency yet deployed older patriarchal frameworks. The result is analysis that questions law's emancipatory capacity rather than assuming it.
What does this book leave readers with long after finishing it?
- A permanent scepticism toward legal claims of gender neutrality and progressive intent
- Analytical tools to deconstruct how judicial language naturalises patriarchal assumptions about women's proper social roles
- Recognition that law functions as much to discipline bodies as to deliver abstract justice
- A sobering awareness that formal legal rights coexist with pervasive regulatory mechanisms targeting female autonomy
- Intellectual grounding to challenge the liberal-feminist faith that better laws alone will liberate women from structural oppression


